Obama’s new free speech threat: An Executive order seeks to punish U.S. citizens even for “indirectly” obstructing dictatorial rule in Yemen
There is substantial opposition in both Yemen and the West to the new U.S.-backed Yemeni President, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi. Hadi was the long-time Vice President of the Yemeni dictator Ali Abdullah Saleh, and after Saleh finally stepped down last year, Hadi became President as part of an “election” in which he was the only candidate (that little fact did not prevent Hillary Clinton from congratulating Yemen “on today’s successful presidential election” (successful because the U.S. liked the undemocratic outcome)). As it does with most U.S.-compliant dictators in the region, the Obama administration has since been propping up Hadi with large amounts of money and military assistance, but it is now taking a much more extreme step to ensure he remains entrenched in power — a step that threatens not only basic liberties in Yemen but in the U.S. as well:
President Obama plans to issue an executive order Wednesday giving the Treasury Department authority to freeze the U.S.-based assets of anyone who “obstructs” implementation of the administration-backed political transition in Yemen.
The unusual order, which administration officials said also targets U.S. citizens who engage in activity deemed to threaten Yemen’s security or political stability, is the first issued for Yemen that does not directly relate to counterterrorism.
Unlike similar measures authorizing terrorist designations and sanctions, the new order does not include a list of names or organizations already determined to be in violation. Instead, one official said, it is designed as a “deterrent” to “make clear to those who are even thinking of spoiling the transition” to think again… .
The order provides criteria to take action against people who the Treasury secretary, in consultation with the secretary of state, determines have “engaged in acts that directly or indirectly threaten the peace, security or stability of Yemen, such as acts that obstruct the implementation of the Nov. 23, 2011, agreement between the Government of Yemen and those in opposition to it, which provides for a peaceful transition of power . . . or that obstruct the political process in Yemen.”
In other words, the U.S. Government will now punish anyone who is determined — in the sole discretion of the U.S. Government — even to “indirectly” obstruct the full transition of power to President Hadi. But what if someone — a Yemeni or an American — opposes Hadi’s rule and wants to agitate for a real election in which more than one candidate runs? Is that pure political advocacy, as it appears, now prohibited by the U.S. Government, punishable by serious sanctions, on the ground that it “obstructs” the transition of power to Hadi? Can journalists who report on corruption or violence by the Hadi regime and who write Op-Eds demanding a new election be accused, as it seems, of “threatening Yemen’s political stability”?
Posted on Wednesday, 16 May 2012
- leftistshuffle reblogged this from silas216
- silas216 reblogged this from socialuprooting
- silas216 likes this
- sunsmudge likes this
- julianproxy likes this
- hobbitswizardskitties likes this
- topernic reblogged this from socialuprooting
- inspirement reblogged this from demandingtheimpossible
- interactivesleep reblogged this from socialuprooting
- swampprat likes this
- mellybee09 reblogged this from socialuprooting
- hyungjk likes this
- demandingtheimpossible reblogged this from socialuprooting
- albeitcognitive likes this
- smallrevolutionary reblogged this from socialuprooting
- aimabovetheclouds reblogged this from socialuprooting and added:
- therecipe reblogged this from socialuprooting
- extremeawesomeghetto likes this
- therecipe likes this
- gracefree reblogged this from socialuprooting
- get--in--the--boat reblogged this from socialuprooting
- kickassical likes this